Subject	Lots of misinformation here...
Posted by	Only1Z on December 01, 2002 at 1:31 PM
	This message has been viewed 68 times.
In Reply To	READ,Mr. JMT-Z.Iroc z comes with a LT1 posted by Nostype2@aol.com on December 01, 2002 at 01:13 PM
Message	First off, it was not an LT1. LT1's didn't come out until '93. Secondly, the RS was not a 2.8 liter V6, but rather a 5.0 liter V8. It actually was rated about 5 hp better than the 5.7 in the IROC. The base Camaro had the 2.8.
Follow Ups	Caulk another.....for the Z32's - Unreal 12:33:38 12/01/02 i cant believe an iroc camaro even stayed that close, they - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 12:40:28 12/01/02 with the mods richard has, that IROC HAD to be highly MODDED - CaptanZap 12:45:46 12/01/02 totally had to been highly modded, great kill! (n/m) - Red ZX (SoCal) 12:55:55 12/01/02 READ,Mr. JMT-Z.Iroc z comes with a LT1 - Nostype2@aol.com 13:13:13 12/01/02 Um, Iroc Zs didnt come with LT1s >>> - SoSideways 13:19:32 12/01/02 Lots of misinformation here... - Only1Z 13:31:06 12/01/02 RS was a 305 and some were actually a v6. (n/m) - taco82xx 13:48:15 12/01/02 Yes...a 305 is a 5.0 liter...so I think I'm correct - Only1Z 14:13:51 12/01/02 uh actually youre wrong and only1z is right, I already knew - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 13:49:19 12/01/02 The "old-school" IROC-Z had a L98 5.7 Liter (350) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 19:15:14 12/01/02 yeah, actually, i think the 350 started in 87 - joel(PA) 19:44:47 12/01/02 Thanks (n/m) - Unreal 14:31:44 12/01/02 I don't know.. - Unreal 14:29:39 12/01/02 for it to hang w/ you high end with your turbos.. - CaptanZap 14:33:12 12/01/02 Caulk or Chalk? (n/m) - sebring1970 13:42:03 12/01/02 ok,ok,ok, it's Chalk ...lol (n/m) - Unreal 14:38:43 12/01/02 haha! (n/m) - georgeu2000 21:52:23 12/01/02 iroc's > Z's (n/m) - genic 14:01:48 12/01/02 whore (n/m) - CaptanZap 14:33:36 12/01/02 redneck (n/m) - sbsTT(MD)(Brute Squad) 00:55:35 12/02/02 Sounds like a F-Body w/ a GM crate motor (major mod)... (n/m) - quikz 15:24:28 12/01/02 If you made it into fifth gear then you were going FAST> - Xi0nX4 (ohio) 15:34:54 12/01/02 I will ..thanks (n/m) - Unreal 19:29:28 12/01/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.